Reston the
Town Becomes an Election Issue
Independent Progressive
By John Lovaas/Civic leader and Reston
Impact producer/host
August 15, 2007
The
November 2007 elections feature only two competitive races in Reston —
Hunter Mill District supervisor and School Board member. Long-time
incumbents Del. Ken Plum and state Sen. Janet Howell face no competition
in their re-election bids. Fairfax County Board Chairman Gerry Connolly,
who has raised about a zillion dollars (nearly half from developers and
friends in Reston and elsewhere seeking favorable land-use rulings), has
little more than token opposition. Supervisor Catherine Hudgins,
however, faces difficulty in her bid for a third term. The Vienna piece
of her district is by no means in her column — and there is unrest in
her home base of Reston.
In Reston, the town issue is very much alive and is gaining momentum for
several reasons. As property taxes soar (accompanied by the giant
sucking sound of Fairfax County gorging itself on our money), folks with
more modest homes feel the pinch and are becoming more sensitive to the
unfairness of Reston Association (RA) assessments. Lower-priced homes
pay the same fees as far more expensive ones. Meanwhile, renters, who
make up one-third of Reston’s population, are noticing that RA gives
the bulk of voting rights to homeowners, while practically
disenfranchising renters. But this lack of fairness and basic democracy
have been with Reston from the beginning — when Fairfax County
blackmailed founder Robert Simon not to use the Town charter he acquired
with his land purchase. So why are they rising to the surface now?
In talking to scores of residents recently, the complaint I hear most
often is that people are fed up with the way growth is being managed (or
not managed) and the powerlessness of the community to do anything about
it. The Fairfax Board of Supervisors’ recent action to raise the
ceiling on new residences by thousands of units, ignoring the unanimous
objections of Reston’s community organizations, brought home that
sense of powerlessness for many Restonians. Many have also caught on to
the con game of appointed “advisory” committees, which are little
more than cherry-picked folks doing the supervisor’s bidding under the
guise of “community input.”
Lack of accountability is often cited by those unhappy with the status
quo. And there is confusion about where to go to get things done, and
disappointment that the Reston Association isn’t more effective in
solving problems. Sometimes the finger is pointed at RA when the problem
is not within their purview — e.g., blame for undesirable new density.
Other times, the blame may be merited — e.g., taking years to deal
with the very exclusive country club siphoning water from Lake Anne
(without paying a dime) and impeding residents’ air conditioning.
Creeping, undesirable density is a symbol of our discontent, but when
you scratch beneath the surface, there are many more irritants. Overall,
a sense of powerlessness (“the county is going to do what it wants
anyway”), unresponsiveness (“do you have any idea how long it takes
to get action from the county health department?” asked a
businessman), and lack of accountability have driven voters to make
governance a priority issue in this election. After all, a town would
not only bring greater equity and accountability, it would also empower
Restonians to make land-use decisions — at little or no added cost.
Hudgins is flatly opposed to self-government for Reston; she won’t
even support putting it to a vote. Her position may be motivated by more
than a desire to protect her own status and power, but it is hardly the
position of a community leader serving the public interest. A true
leader would allow citizens to decide the issue themselves. Independent
candidate Marie Huhtala is inclined to favor town status for Reston, and
if elected will push for a referendum to let the community decide. The
other Independent candidates presumably will make their views on
incorporation known soon.
While the current surge in support for Reston the Town may not yet
reflect the majority needed to carry a referendum, what is the harm in
letting the people decide for themselves, after a thorough airing of the
proposal? Who’s afraid of democracy? Reston voters can be expected to
ask this question to each candidate for supervisor, and they’ll be
listening carefully to the answers they get.
© 2007 Connection Newspapers. All Rights Reserved. |