County
Outlines Changes for Reston Development
Staff recommends additional residential
development of 3,800 high-rise units.
By
Jason Hartke - September 14, 2006
Recommended
Changes
In a staff paper
released Monday, the county listed five
recommendations listed below. To read the
entire, eight-page staff paper, visit http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/dpz
.
* Staff agrees the density cap of 13 persons per
acre should be retained for now, but should be
open to review in the future.
* Under the ordinance, calculating density is
determined based on population factors for
various housing types — 3.5 persons per single
family detached, 3 persons per single family
attached, 2.5 persons per garden apartment and 2
persons per elevator apartment. Staff believes
these values are antiquated and should be
reduced, which would allow for greater density.
Staff’s recommended reductions in the factors
would increase allowable residential development
by an additional 3,800 high-rise units.
* To prevent redevelopment administratively,
staff recommends that rezoning require review
and approval by the Planning Commission and the
Board of Supervisors.
* Staff believes the Comprehensive Plan provides
sufficient guidance for future redevelopment,
but may need to be amended to clarify existing
residential development, depicted now as low,
medium or high, so that they match
specifications used for the rest of the county
(dwelling units per acre).
* Staff recommends that planning for Lake Anne
should be first priority.

Photo
by Jason Hartke
Jim
Zook, the county’s chief planner, discusses
staff recommendations to change the Planned
Residential Community ordinance as Supervisor
Cathy Hudgins (Hunter Mill) and members of the
Reston Planning and Zoning Committee listen in. |
|
|
In an
eight-page staff paper released Monday, the county recommended changes
to Reston’s zoning ordinance that would allow more density but would
incorporate greater legislative controls. (See box.)
Since Reston is nearing its density cap of 13 persons per acre, a zoning
ordinance amendment is required to prevent additional residential
development from coming to a standstill.
But if additional density is allowed, Reston resident Arthur Hill’s
first question was where would it go.
“If it’s allowed, someone will find a way to use it,” said Hill at
Monday’s Reston Planning and Zoning Committee meeting. “Where will
it go? The [Reston] Town Center is full.”
WITH LITTLE UNDEVELOPED space in Reston to add density, Hill, the
committee’s vice chair, suggested developers will soon look at already
developed areas for redevelopment opportunities.
Zook pointed out that one of the primary problems with Reston’s zoning
ordinance now is that it allows some rezoning approvals without
legislative review.
“Currently there is potential for a residential cluster to further
develop or redevelop in a manner that is not compatible with neighboring
properties without review by the Planning Commission or legislative
action by the Board of Supervisors,” said the staff paper Zook
presented at the meeting.
To rectify that situation, Zook said Reston’s zoning ordinance should
be changed. Integrating legislative controls, Zook argued, would give
the community greater influence in the redevelopment process.
Supervisor Cathy Hudgins (D-Hunter Mill), who led the meeting, agreed.
She said the primary motivation to change the ordinance was to integrate
legislative controls.
HUDGINS HAS CHARGED the Reston P&Z committee to lead a series of
community meetings intended to solicit community input and build
consensus on what to do next.
But Zook has said he would like to see changes approved by the Board of
Supervisors before the end of the year.
Several residents asked what was the hurry.
Under the ordinance, called the Planned Residential Community, which
governs about 6,200 acres in Reston, maximum residential density is
capped at 13 persons per acre. Current density in Reston is 11.68
persons per acre, according to the county. The available density under
the cap allows for only 4,106 high-rise units if changes are not made.
Yet development applications already in the pipeline, if approved, would
drop the potential for additional residential high-rise units to below
2,000.
If the cap is ever reached, no additional residential development would
be allowed. Redevelopment could occur, but not at additional rates of
density.
The first community meeting was scheduled Sept. 20 until Reston resident
Faye Codding questioned the timing. “Why are they scheduled [to start]
eight days from now?” said Codding. “It seems like a very short
timeline.”
Members of the P&Z agreed with Codding and decided to change the
opening meeting to Oct. 4.
© 2006 Connection Newspapers. All Rights Reserved. |