Town: Part
of Reston’s History
By John Lovaas - October 13, 2007
As I
read last week’s Connection, I came across Ken Plum’s column on
local governance. Now, Ken Plum is a guy I’ve long admired, thought he
was a cut above the typical long-time politician, a gentleman in fact.
Also, on issues such as education and health care, for example, he is
normally my kind of progressive. Although in bowing to Dominion
Power’s re-regulation scheme he dipped a bit, when he voted against
Gov. Tim Kaine’s repeal of the fairest tax of them all (estate tax on
the fattest of cats), Plum solidified his position in my pantheon of
good guys.
So, his column struck me as unusual. Here was Plum, a proponent of Town
before he spent so many years in the higher altitudes and before he
experienced some kind of political epiphany in the 1980s, raking the
Reston Citizens Association and their current petition drive for a
referendum on becoming a town over the coals. His arguments are a rehash
of things said earlier which are neither law nor regulation — with a
couple exceptions: he sternly warns that the Virginia Constitution
requires that a majority of voters approve a change in the form of their
government. No kidding! The purpose of the referendum proposed by Reston
Citizens Association is to allow the voters just such an opportunity. He
also notes that a specific charter proposal would be required at the
time of the vote — he must have been away from Reston this year while
RCA held a series of public meetings on the elements of a new Town
charter which is in an advanced stage.
Others will address other obvious holes in worn and patronizing
arguments. Most troubling to me is that Plum, a long-time Restonian
finds nothing special about Reston compared with any other piece of
unincorporated land in this county. He would simply lump us in with all
of them. He ignores that, thanks to Robert Simon, this is indeed a
special place, recognized as one of America’s premier planned
communities with a distinctive identity growing out of our founding
principles. He also ignores the fact that when Simon bought the land for
his Reston dream, he bought with it a legal charter for a town already
granted by the Virginia legislature. But when Simon moved to develop
Reston, Fairfax County officials threatened to withhold services like
sewer permits if he exercised his charter (see "Reston-Past,
Present and Future" documentary).
Then, in 1989, a bill was passed by the Virginia legislature revoking
the town charter (see "Reston" by Nan Netherton). Reston
residents were not consulted. Coincidentally, at that time another
movement was afoot for a referendum on becoming a town. Some powerful
forces opposed even having a vote — as Plum and Supervisor Hudgins do
now. At about the time the charter was revoked, the legislature also
enacted a new law making if more difficult for communities to
incorporate. I have heard an explanation of this coincidence. Delegate
Plum was there. Perhaps he’ll tell Reston his version one of these
days. For now, Delegate Plum should stand up for the community as he has
before, and let the people decide the issue.
Two of the three Ssupervisor candidates support referendum. So should
he.
© 2007 Connection Newspapers. All Rights Reserved. |